Content doesn’t come from Google

• iTunes replaced the record store for distribution of Music
• Netflix replaced Blockbuster as the distribution for Movies’s
• Amazon replaced Barnes and Noble as the distrubtion for Books
• People will pay to read content that matters to them - Micropayments or subscriptions to Online News (WSJ, NYT)
• Google is not evil, but blind love of Google will lead to evilness.

I’ve been neglecting my blog here for some time, but I had this saved as a draft and based on many of the conversations I’ve had in the past few days, I felt that this brief thought captured some good points. Content doesn’t come from Google, it comes from people. Some of those people are professional journalists, but many of them now are just regular “Joe 6-Packs.” You and me posting our thoughts, our pictures - all of us out here sharing our lives.

Regardless of where it comes from, Google doesn’t create any of it and its not claiming it does. Google is out organizing information, which is one form of content. And as we grow less mindful of where our content comes from, or even who is creating it, the medium loses its value and we simply consume content in whatever form it appears in front of us. For me, I see the web as finally having caught up and mimicked our physical world experience with word of mouth. Twitter and Facebook have taken an innate human action, word of mouth, and amplified it online. Almost none of the content I consume comes from Google (except when I am seeking specific information).

My point is that content comes from the people around us, and when we watch, listen or read something that is very interesting to us, it doesn’t often matter who made the content - we remember who told us about it, or where we found it. In todays world wide web, where we found it is rarely on Google, it is from within our social network of friends and acquaintances.

I’ve heard something about this social graph idea…